Abstract
Problems relating to plastic pollution have gained increasing attention over the last decade. In Australia, a number of government and industry initiatives, such as the prohibition on the sale of certain plastics, have sought to respond to growing community concern regarding the negative environmental effects associated with plastic production and use. However, regulation has been haphazard and, as a result, has contributed to confusion and regulatory overlap (or underlap) that contradicts the central goal of minimising the negative environmental effects of plastic. While plastic pollution has gained a great deal of attention, there has been very little legal scholarship in Australia exploring regulation. This article seeks to address this gap in legal scholarship by comprehensively analysing the different approaches to plastic regulation across various jurisdictions in Australia. The analysis suggests that the scattered regulatory approach, as well as half-hearted co-ordination, prevent the successful implementation in Australia of a circular economy for plastics: one of the key goals of regulatory regimes across Australia.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 124-145 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Environmental and Planning Law Journal |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Kourabas, S. (2023). Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution: letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom? Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 39(2), 124-145.
Kourabas, Steve ; Nagtzaam, Gerry. / Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution : letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom?. In: Environmental and Planning Law Journal. 2023 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 124-145.
@article{345ff84b1bed4341abd955fb1493ac82,
title = "Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution: letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom?",
abstract = "Problems relating to plastic pollution have gained increasing attention over the last decade. In Australia, a number of government and industry initiatives, such as the prohibition on the sale of certain plastics, have sought to respond to growing community concern regarding the negative environmental effects associated with plastic production and use. However, regulation has been haphazard and, as a result, has contributed to confusion and regulatory overlap (or underlap) that contradicts the central goal of minimising the negative environmental effects of plastic. While plastic pollution has gained a great deal of attention, there has been very little legal scholarship in Australia exploring regulation. This article seeks to address this gap in legal scholarship by comprehensively analysing the different approaches to plastic regulation across various jurisdictions in Australia. The analysis suggests that the scattered regulatory approach, as well as half-hearted co-ordination, prevent the successful implementation in Australia of a circular economy for plastics: one of the key goals of regulatory regimes across Australia.",
author = "Steve Kourabas and Gerry Nagtzaam",
year = "2023",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "124--145",
journal = "Environmental and Planning Law Journal",
issn = "0813-300X",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "2",
}
Kourabas, S 2023, 'Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution: letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom?', Environmental and Planning Law Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 124-145.
Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution: letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom? / Kourabas, Steve; Nagtzaam, Gerry.
In: Environmental and Planning Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2023, p. 124-145.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution
T2 - letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom?
AU - Kourabas, Steve
AU - Nagtzaam, Gerry
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Problems relating to plastic pollution have gained increasing attention over the last decade. In Australia, a number of government and industry initiatives, such as the prohibition on the sale of certain plastics, have sought to respond to growing community concern regarding the negative environmental effects associated with plastic production and use. However, regulation has been haphazard and, as a result, has contributed to confusion and regulatory overlap (or underlap) that contradicts the central goal of minimising the negative environmental effects of plastic. While plastic pollution has gained a great deal of attention, there has been very little legal scholarship in Australia exploring regulation. This article seeks to address this gap in legal scholarship by comprehensively analysing the different approaches to plastic regulation across various jurisdictions in Australia. The analysis suggests that the scattered regulatory approach, as well as half-hearted co-ordination, prevent the successful implementation in Australia of a circular economy for plastics: one of the key goals of regulatory regimes across Australia.
AB - Problems relating to plastic pollution have gained increasing attention over the last decade. In Australia, a number of government and industry initiatives, such as the prohibition on the sale of certain plastics, have sought to respond to growing community concern regarding the negative environmental effects associated with plastic production and use. However, regulation has been haphazard and, as a result, has contributed to confusion and regulatory overlap (or underlap) that contradicts the central goal of minimising the negative environmental effects of plastic. While plastic pollution has gained a great deal of attention, there has been very little legal scholarship in Australia exploring regulation. This article seeks to address this gap in legal scholarship by comprehensively analysing the different approaches to plastic regulation across various jurisdictions in Australia. The analysis suggests that the scattered regulatory approach, as well as half-hearted co-ordination, prevent the successful implementation in Australia of a circular economy for plastics: one of the key goals of regulatory regimes across Australia.
M3 - Article
SN - 0813-300X
VL - 39
SP - 124
EP - 145
JO - Environmental and Planning Law Journal
JF - Environmental and Planning Law Journal
IS - 2
ER -
Kourabas S, Nagtzaam G. Australia's regulatory approach to plastic pollution: letting a thousand (plastic) flowers bloom? Environmental and Planning Law Journal. 2023;39(2):124-145.